Canada has reason to be in Latvia

April 5, 2017 by Stephen J. Thorne

Canadian, American and Latvian soldiers get a briefing during training in Germany in March.


M.CPL. Jennifer Kusche/Combat Camera
Recent events on and within the borders of Russia should quell lingering doubt, if any exists, around the wisdom of Canada contributing troops to European security.

After 13 years fighting a war in Afghanistan, Canadian soldiers have come full circle, returning to the once-familiar climes of Europe to join efforts to discourage Moscow’s growing aggression.

Canada recently renewed a military training commitment in Ukraine, where Russian President Vladimir Putin annexed Crimea and gave tacit support to rebels in 2014. And it is leading a NATO battle group in Latvia, one of four the alliance is mounting in Baltic states. The others are in Estonia, Lithuania and Poland.

Latvia and the other states first annexed by the former Soviet Union during the Second World War are widely seen as coveted prizes to Putin. They would provide access to key ports, expand influence, and restore Kremlin pride and hegemony.

Latvia, along with Estonia and Lithuania, emerged from behind the Iron Curtain in the late 1980s via a near-bloodless revolution. Poland had its own revolt, and all have thrived since regaining their independence in the early 1990s.

Chief of the Defence Staff General Jonathan Vance.
Adam Day/Legion Magazine
General Jonathan Vance reinforced concerns over Russia’s re-emergence as a threat to Europe and others in an interview with Legion Magazine shortly after his appointment as chief of the defence staff in 2015.

“The resurgence of a belligerent Russia that is using other-than-recognized international norms to achieve political objectives is worrying,” he said. “I think that this will be an effort that will go on for some time.”

Indeed, in recent weeks Putin has served up bitter reminders that all is not well on the European continent.

On March 24, Denis Voronenkova, a former Russian lawmaker and Putin opponent, was assassinated in a Kiev street. Voronenkova had compared modern Russia to Nazi Germany, called the annexation of Crimea illegal and renounced his Russian citizenship. He was testifying at the in-absentia treason trial of Ukraine’s former Moscow-aligned president, Viktor Yanukovych, who is now living in Russia.

It was the second assassination bearing Kremlin hallmarks in less than a week—public, bloody, a statement—and it came one day before Putin met with Marie Le Pen, leader of France’s far-right Front National. Running in a bellwether presidential election later this month, Le Pen has publicly backed the Russian annexation of Crimea and frequently expressed admiration for Putin.

If the suggestion of political assassinations on foreign soil is not enough, Putin’s apparent meddling in the affairs of foreign states has raised concerns. New analysis by an American think tank says Putin is behind much of the anti-immigrant, anti-establishment sentiment in Europe and is seen as contributing momentum to right-wing politics across the continent, in Britain and across the Atlantic.

In the Netherlands, far-right politician Geert Wilders was dealt a surprise defeat in an early-March election, but few saw it as a tide-turner. Besides France, the far-right will figure in elections in Germany, Italy and Bulgaria over the next year.

The paper by the left-leaning Center for American Progress, entitled Russia’s Fifth Column, asserts that Putin has set out to create nothing less than a new world order that would boost his power, reduce U.S. influence, reshape democracy and replace liberalism with ultra-conservatism.

On his visit to Riga last October, Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan received a hockey jersey representing Latvia.
Cpl Gabrielle DesRochers/Combat Camera
Putin, it says, has aggressively set out to weaken the political alliances that existed through the Cold War as he seeks to regain Russia’s strategic position in Europe: “The bond between the United States and European democracies, forged over the past 100 years, is built on the shared values of freedom, human rights, and the rule of law. Putin’s Russia rejects all of those values.”

In exchange for adherence to Russian interests, the paper says, Putin’s efforts in Europe have served to elevate the profiles of far-right leaders through disinformation, propaganda, illicit financing and “covert influence operations.”

Europe’s far-right “now operate[s] as a fifth column that is undermining the Western liberal order from within.” The paper cites case examples involving the Front National, Wilders’ Party for Freedom, Germany’s Alternative für Deutschland, Austria’s Freedom Party, the U.K. Independence Party and others.

Vance called Russia “a big strategic threat,” a nuclear-arms state that is “thwarting not only international norms but common decency.”

“Their behaviour is bad, not just in eastern Europe,” he said. “Their behaviour is bad elsewhere, too…and I suspect if their behaviour doesn’t change, they will provide a long-term strategic problem.”

While meeting with Le Pen, Putin said that Russia had no intention of meddling in the French vote. “We do not want to influence events in any way, but we retain the right to meet with all the different political forces, just like our European and American partners do.”

Le Pen called herself “a totally free woman.”

“I don’t want to be under the yoke of the U.S. I don’t want to be under the yoke of Russia,” she said. “We are in a period where conspiracy theories appear to be very much in fashion. As soon as something goes wrong, it’s Russia’s fault. This makes me smile.”

  • George

    Yes, but no… I just finished 2 years on the front line of the Donbass working for the OSCE- where Canadian diplomats and soldiers do not go. Yes, Russia is acting aggressively and measures need to be taken. Yes, we are part of NATO.

    However, as Legion Magazine has so rightly pointed out, the Canadian Government has reduced the military to almost nothing over the last decades.

    We therefore need to pick our overseas deployments carefully so that we maximize protection of our strategic interests and our impact. Both are far greater in Africa than they are in Eastern Europe. Europe has plenty of soldiers, it is much more in their strategic interests, they are closer, and culturally and linguistically they are much better able to interact.

    So let the Europeans, particularly the East Europeans take the lead there and let Canada focus on Africa.

Member Benefits Package
Last Post
Subscribe

CONNECT

Classified Ads
FREE SHIPPING on orders $75+
Shop Now